[Summit] devroom schedule is final!
zooldk at gmail.com
Thu Jan 24 09:11:35 UTC 2013
True true Dave!. We might be able to benefit from the Jabber name, because it is more recognisable. Then how about calling it Jabber/XMPP when we are on FOSDEM and other conferences?
And little by little we can start removing the Jabber tag that is bound to us, and XMPP will be recognised as the thing it is. :-)
On Jan 24, 2013, at 9:29 AM, Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2013 8:17 AM, "Steffen Larsen" <zooldk at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> > Just for the fun of it.. why is our schedule on FOSDEM still called Jabber? Isn't it time for changing the name? hence the talk on the dev list regarding the Jabber name trademark. :-)
> Jabber is still a more recognizable name; it'd be nice to change it, but the problem is that people aren't searching for XMPP.
> We may yet have to change, since Cisco now use the trademark for a number of products not directly related to XMPP, which is unfortunate.
> You're quite correct though that this is a branding problem for us, and one we will have to confront.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Summit