The general idea here was that the URI is for *machines* to process, so it doesn't have to be exact. A machine would treat spam and generic abuse differently (eg. it might apply automated spem scanning to one message, but immediately forward the other along to a moderator). In my view any new URI should be something that can be handled by a machine and that would be different than how the existing URIs are handled. This means they are very general in nature. Everything else should be handled by the description. That being said, I'd like to make more improvements to this spec and think we can do a lot better, but since adoption is already low I'm hesitant to expand it without first figuring out how to increase adoption. —Sam On 2/27/24 06:59, Matthew Wild wrote: -- Sam Whited sam(a)samwhited.com