Hi folks, Most of you are probably familiar with CVEs. They're like universal bug numbers for security vulnerabilities. They make it much easier to exchange information about security issues in software, if everyone refers to the same vulnerability by the same number. The CVE ecosystem isn't perfect, and has been a bit turbulent over recent years. One cause of this is that the number of vulnerabilities has been increasing for a long time, and the organization that used to issue them became a bottleneck - it now delegates a lot of the work to others. One way it does this delegation is by working with "CVE Numbering Authorities". Basically, organizations can register as a numbering authority (CVE issuer) within a particular category of software. Sometimes this can be a single project (the Linux kernel recently became a CNA), but ideally it encompasses a range of related software. Which leads to the obvious suggestion... I believe it would be beneficial for the XSF to apply for CNA status, with the scope of issuing CVEs for software within the XMPP ecosystem. There are various benefits: - The XSF is already a hub for XMPP software developers, making discoverability and issuance easier for projects - Response times may be faster (due to the narrow scope, the XSF will naturally receive a far lower volume of CVE requests than generic CNAs such as MITRE) - The XSF has a history of coordinating vulnerability communication between projects when necessary. This has been very useful in the past, and it would help to bolster that activity. I think it would be sensible for us to discuss this. If there is positive consensus, I don't mind taking on the task of the application and any necessary processes. However for the operation of a CNA programme it would be good to have at least several trusted people willing to work on such a team. Further reading: - https://www.cve.org/PartnerInformation/Partner - https://nvd.nist.gov/general/cna-counting Regards, Matthew