- Members - XMPP

Include contact information for XSF Members on the website

by Guus der Kinderen

Dear XSF members, The xmpp.org website describes the organisation of the XSF, including its members and their roles. One of the key purposes of the website is to help interested individuals and organisations get in touch with people involved in XMPP. Where we list XSF members on the website, we should include appropriate contact information (such as email addresses, XMPP handles) to make it easier for visitors to reach out to them directly (more importantly for people that serve on bodies like Board and Council) Providing contact details would: - Improve accessibility and communication within the XMPP community. - Encourage collaboration and engagement with developers, contributors, and newcomers. - Align with the XSF’s goal of openness and community-driven development. We have already recorded JIDs for all members on the website. I suggest that we add email addresses for people that are interested in having their contact details published, and think of some kind of opt-in mechanism. An implementation of this is in the works at https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/issues/1572 which contains a mock up of a possible realisation. What do you think? Kind regards, Guus

5 months, 3 weeks

2
1
0 0

XMPP Summit 28 (We have a date!)

by Daniel Gultsch

Hi all, We have a date for FOSDEM 2026: January 31st to February 1st This means we also have a date for Summit 28: January 29th - January 30th As the person who has (co)organized the last two summits I would like to start a discussion on the next summit by asking a few questions and floating some ideas. • How did you like the format of the last three summits? (Renting a conference room in a hotel with lunch provided (in buffet style) by the hotel) • Do you have a concrete lead for some company or organization that could provide us with a conference room for free in the city of Brussels? I’m not asking for vague suggestions like "maybe someone could try to reach out to xyz" I’m asking if you personally know someone who has a key to a room. • Do we want a 1 day or 2 day summit? Last year the 'official' part of the summit was over after 1.2 days and had we known this we could have probably managed to squeeze it all into one day. • If we do a repeat of the last two (three) years (which i feel is somewhat likely due to how difficult it is to find places that would have us for free and because I’m under the impression that people like the "fancy environment" with the snacks and the fancy bottles of water) I feel somewhat strongly that we should switch to a model in which every participant pays for their own seat (at per cost) and add a fairly generous fee-waiver on top of it. I’m very much in favor of keeping the Summit accessible. (Socio)economicly speaking our community is very diverse. We have people in our community who would not be able to come if they had to pay the ~250 Euro the hotel charges us per person. But we also have people in our community to whom this is a rounding error in the overall travel+accommodation cost. (I have personally been on both sides of this.) The XSF notoriously doesn’t have a lot of money and efforts to change this over the last 3 years haven’t been very successful. Switching to a fee waiver model would allow board (or whoever) to set aside a fixed amount and send x (where x=10 for example) applicants to the summit for free. cheers Daniel

5 months, 3 weeks

8
8
0 0

"Chat Control" EU project and impact on XMPP community ?

by Mickaël Rémond

Hello, I have been recently reading about the "Chat Control" EU project. For those interested, Tuta has a nice summary: https://tuta.com/blog/chat-control-criticism Reading the project, I have been surprised to see it could have deep consequences, not only for big messaging players, but for any chat hosting providers. The idea is that all providers should be able to monitor and report traffic defined as prohibited by the state Coordinating Authority. Providers list include hosting service, interpersonal communications services, for example. I did not see any exemption in terms of platform sizes so I assume it could have a serious impact on XMPP server hosting. I do not even see how it can be applied to an open protocol, given that you can connect to a server with any compliant client, we would have no way to enforce a backdoor for message scanning. Have there been some discussion on that topic at the XSF ? Is it really as catastrophic as it looks ? And if so, what should we do as members or as XSF ? Thanks ! -- Mickaël Rémond

6 months

6
14
0 0

voting results & meeting minutes

by Alexander Gnauck

Hello, you can find our meeting minutes here: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Meeting-Minutes-2025-09-04 A warm welcome to our new member Gonzalo Raúl. Feel free to introduce yourself to the list and volunteer for one of our teams. You can find some info on the XSF teams here: https://xmpp.org/community/membership/ Also our annual board & council elections are upcoming. I will work on a Wiki page and will start the process soon. Thanks, Alex

7 months

1
0
0 0

voting update

by Alexander Gnauck

According to my records the following 20 XSF members have voted via proxy in the current voting period: * nicoco (at) nicoco.fr * root (at) nicolosus.chat * trần.h.trung (at) trung.fun * gideon (at) xmpp.earth * soul (at) blastersklan.com * singpolyma (at) singpolyma.net * badrihippo (at) disroot.org * kobit (at) tigase.org * mario (at) sabatino.pro * eevvoor (at) jabber.fr * nicola (at) nicfab.chat * guus.der.kinderen (at) igniterealtime.org * daniel (at) spacecloud.one * martin (at) mdosch.de * mathieui (at) mathieui.net * holger (at) jabber.fu-berlin.de * gnauck (at) conversations.im * linkmauve (at) linkmauve.fr * andrzej.wojcik (at) tigase.org * tim (at) mailbox.bz If you have not yet voted, please send a message to xmpp:memberbot@xmpp.org. If you have problems with memberbot please contact me directly by email or xmpp. Thanks, Alex

7 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

OFFICIAL MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT

by Alexander Gnauck

I've started proxy voting via xmpp:memberbot@xmpp.org on the membership applications listed here: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Membership_Applications_Q3_2025 We will hold a member meeting on September 4th to formally approve the voting results. The meeting particulars are: Date: September 4, 2025 Time: 19.00 UTC Location: xmpp:xsf@muc.xmpp.org When you have problems with memberbot please contact my directly by email or xmpp. Thanks, Alex

7 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Membership Application period Q3 2025

by Alexander Gnauck

I have created the membership application page for Q3 2025 at: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Membership_Applications_Q3_2025 The following XSF members have to reapply: * Travis Burtrum * Martin Dosch * Severino Ferrer de la Peñita * Timothée Jaussoin * Trevor Krahn * Tobias Markmann * Ralph Meijer * Edwin Mons * Emmanuel Gil Peyrot * Peter Saint-Andre * Holger Weiß * Natalie Wirth * Marvin Wissfeld * Gideon White Thanks, Alex

7 months, 4 weeks

1
1
0 0

Confusion in protocol name

by Mickaël Rémond

Hello, I came across the XMTP protocol (https://xmtp.org). It is a messaging protocol based on the blockchain, supported by Ephemera, a company with large fundings. The protocol is presented as "XMTP (Extensible Message Transport Protocol) is the largest and most secure decentralized messaging network". It seems to be confusing for the whole messaging community and I have a hard time imagining it is not on purpose. Should we, as the XSF, make a move ? We could ask the IETF if they also would want to join a letter of clarification. What do you think about it ? Kind regards, -- Mickaël Rémond

8 months, 2 weeks

3
4
0 0

Renaming git main branches.

by Goffi

Hello dear XSF Members, I see that we are still using "master" as the name of the main branch on Git repositories (here, for instance: https://github.com/xsf/xeps ). You are probably all aware that the use of this term has raised controversy in recent years, as it can be perceived as a reference to slavery (see https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%E2%80%93slave_(technology)#Controversy for instance). To avoid this unwanted reference and ensure the XSF is welcoming to everyone, I propose that we change these branch names to "main," as many notable projects have done (such as Python, the Linux Kernel, or GitHub). I'm not sure whether this matter should be discussed in the Board or Council (as it is a technical issue), but it would be good to add it to the agenda. Thank you! Goffi

10 months

5
7
0 0

voting results & meeting minutes

by Alexander Gnauck

Hello, you can find the meeting minutes here: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Meeting-Minutes-2025-06-05 All applicants and reappliers were accepted. You can find the updated memberlist here (once the PR is accepted): http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/xsf/xsf-member-list/ A warm welcome to all our new members. Feel free to introduce yourself to the list and volunteer for one of our teams. You can find some info on the XSF teams here: https://xmpp.org/community/membership/ Also a good start is our XSF channel when you have not joined it already: xmpp:xsf@muc.xmpp.org?join Thanks, Alex

10 months

1
0
0 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

Members