Hi folks,
I would like the board to consider, at their next meeting, the
formation of a team for moderation of XSF discussion venues (at least
MUCs).
"Why?"
Currently the set of people with moderator/admin status in XSF venues
varies from channel to channel, and people are granted permissions on
a rather ad hoc basis. This raises questions of responsibility and
transparency, and moderation varies significantly between channels.
The goal of a moderation team would be to:
- Formally define a set of people to gain moderation rights across all
XSF discussion venues
- Spread the responsibility, accountability and decision-making among members
- Improve communication between moderators (formation of a dedicated
MUC for the team to discuss moderation matters would be sensible)
Currently moderators act primarily as individuals, which leaves them
open to being singled out for retaliation, rather than feeling like
they have the backing of the XSF. This sometimes leads to no
moderation action being taken, when it probably should (if we care
about the health of our community). If moderation decisions can be
agreed with a team, this will help make our moderation actions more
consistent and more fair to both the moderator and the moderated.
"What would be the difference from the conduct team?"
I see the conduct team as a smaller group reserved for tackling only
important cases, mostly reactively, in response to reports and appeals
as described in the CoC. The moderation team would (ideally) consist
of slightly more people. They would be responsible for the day-to-day
moderation duties while following the words of the CoC and the
direction of the conduct team where provided.
Regards,
Matthew
Dear Board members,
This email announces the agenda for our next Board meeting, scheduled for
Thursday, 5 March 2026, from 17:00 to 17:30 UTC. The meeting will take
place in the XSF chatroom at xmpp:xsf@muc.xmpp.org?join.
Brief context is included for each agenda item to support preparation.
*1. Welcome*
Opening of the meeting.
*2. Formalize Agenda*
Confirm and approve the agenda for this meeting.
*3. Vote on: Signing Keep Android Open letter*
Proposal to have the XSF sign the Keep Android Open, opposing the Android
Developer Verification program, as discussed on
https://mail.jabber.org/hyperkitty/list/members@xmpp.org/thread/P7KMMGDGFBA…
*4. Summit follow-up discussion: XMPP 2*
Prior discussions expressed interest; little asynchronous feedback was
received. Determine whether there is sufficient interest to warrant further
work, and either mandate a scoped next step or explicitly conclude that no
further action will be taken at this time.
*5. Progress report: decision-ready proposal for XSF's EU-based presence*
Follow-up on Guus's commitment to present a concrete proposal for
establishing a minimal EU presence for XSF, per action point of the Board
meeting on 15 Dec 2025.
*6. Discuss with Intent to Vote: Have a Moderation Team*
Review the proposal to form a moderation team for XMPP Standards Foundation
discussion spaces, consider the current state of community discussion, and
decide whether the Board is ready to vote on adoption or should defer
pending further input. Related mailinglist thread:
https://mail.jabber.org/hyperkitty/list/members@xmpp.org/thread/U2UU3HG3YHA…
*7. Discuss with Intent to Vote: Membership Name Disclosure Policy*
Review the proposal to make public disclosure of members' real names
optional, assess the maturity of recent membership discussion, and
determine whether the Board should proceed to a vote or request additional
community feedback. Related mailinglist thread
https://mail.jabber.org/hyperkitty/list/members@xmpp.org/thread/JLLM2YCWQBL…
*8. Discuss with Intent to Vote: Publication of Membership Vote Tallies*
Review the proposal to cease public publication of membership vote tallies,
consider member feedback to date, and decide whether conditions are met for
a Board vote at this meeting. Related mailinglist thread
https://mail.jabber.org/hyperkitty/list/members@xmpp.org/thread/JLLM2YCWQBL…
*9. Any Other Business (AOB)*
Items not listed above that require brief attention.
*10. Date of next meeting*
Agreement on the date of the next Board meeting.
*11. Close*
Closing of the meeting.
Please review the relevant materials ahead of the meeting so that we can
use our time efficiently.
Kind regards,
Guus
According to my records the following XSF members have voted via proxy
in the current voting period:
* intosi (at) ik.nu
* nicoco (at) nicoco.fr
* singpolyma (at) singpolyma.net
* linkmauve (at) linkmauve.fr
* badrihippo (at) disroot.org
* kevin.smith (at) isode.com
* lbocquet (at) jabber.org
* mario (at) sabatino.pro
* daniel (at) spacecloud.one
* thilo.molitor (at) juforum.de
* kobit (at) tigase.org
* dele.olajide (at) igniterealtime.org
* dan.caseley (at) igniterealtime.org
* andrzej.wojcik (at) tigase.org
* tim (at) mailbox.bz
* jabber (at) larma.de
* guus.der.kinderen (at) igniterealtime.org
* gnauck (at) conversations.im
We have no quorum yet!
If you have not yet voted, please send a message to xmpp:memberbot@xmpp.org.
If you have problems with memberbot please contact me directly by email
or xmpp.
Thanks,
Alex
Hello,
As an open standards organization I think the XSF should sign https://keepandroidopen.org/open-letter/
There are many reasons but the most obvious is that Android is the most popular operating system in the world (wikipedia says). If you want XMPP adoption by users self hosting, or companies, or govts, they'll all need clients to run on android, and google has a long track record of blocking them. eg https://blog.jmp.chat/b/2026-google-wants-to-control-your-device it's also happened to Conversations and I believe Snikket.
Guus asked that I email here to guage support so please reply to let the board know. If you are like me and despise email drop your support in xmpp:xsf@muc.xmpp.org?join and I'll forward it here for you.
Thanks,
moparisthebest
Hi everyone,
During the recent XMPP Summit, we discussed the idea of organizing a second
Summit in 2026, potentially as an online-only event.
The motivation behind this idea would be to:
- Keep momentum going between in-person Summits
- Lower the barrier to participation
- Create space for focused discussions or follow-ups that don’t
necessarily require physical presence
At this stage, this is very much an open exploration, not a proposal. Some
questions that might be worth discussing:
- Is there interest in an additional Summit this year?
- What goals would such an event serve?
- Would an online format make sense, or are there better alternatives?
- What kind of scope or duration would be reasonable?
I'd like to use this thread to gauge interest and collect initial thoughts.
If there's enough energy around this, we can look at concrete next steps
later.
Looking forward to your input.
Kind regards,
Guus
Hi everyone,
At the Summit, we had a good discussion about outreach and positioning of
XMPP, and whether we could be more deliberate in how we present XMPP as a
technology in relevant communities and markets.
One concrete idea that came up was: Having XSF representatives speak at
selected events (conferences, meetups, etc.)
More generally, this raises questions such as:
- Where do we want XMPP to be more visible?
- What audiences should we prioritize?
- What kinds of materials, messaging, or support would be needed?
- How can we do this in a sustainable, volunteer-friendly way?
This thread is intended to collect ideas, experiences, and opinions on
whether - and how - we might move toward more structured outreach.
No decisions are implied at this point; the goal is simply to start a
focused conversation.
Kind regards,
Guus
TLDR: XSF Communication Team is asking to switch to mailbox.org for 30
EUR per year.
Dear all,
We would like to find a new email address for the XSF Communication Team
that supports all our growing needs. Protonmail no longer meets these
needs for a long time, either for free or at a reasonable price (while
still respecting their service).
We need such an account because Protonmail asked for a paid subscription
to use SMTP with e.g. Thunderbird (yes really). We are also limited in
organizing emails and the inbox as this is also restricted in the free
plan. Additionally, we are currently blocked to use Reddit and LinkedIn
with SocialBu with our Protonmail.
We are therefore looking for a decent host that also supports a good
level of compliance, privacy under GDPR, and possibly comes with more
capabilities at a reasonable price. We have created a service comparison
table here: https://pad.nixnet.services/331YAjbUQOmAWa2Octx_DA?view
Later on, we could also ask Mailbox.org if they could provide a standard
account for free. As they even used to run an XMPP server, they might be
willing to support an account. However, I am not sure how such a
collaboration should look like.
Firstly, we are blocked being fully operational and able to expand as we
could at the moment and I would like to switch first. Then we can expand
cooperation and maybe even sponsoring.
On the other hand, switching to mailbox.org would provide us with
additional organisational tooling that could benefit the XSF and the
XMPP Community such as custom domains and other office tools they provide.
Best regards,
Eddie
Dear Board members,
This email announces the agenda for our next Board meeting, scheduled for
Thursday, 19 February 2026, from 17:00 to 17:30 UTC. The meeting will take
place in the XSF chatroom at xmpp:xsf@muc.xmpp.org?join.
Brief context is included for each agenda item to support preparation.
*1. Welcome*Opening of the meeting.
*2. Formalize Agenda*Confirm and approve the agenda for this meeting.
*3. Vote on: XSF Communication Team's email provider budget*Proposal to
approve the team's migration to Mailbox.org at approximately 30 EUR/year as
discussed most recently on
https://mail.jabber.org/hyperkitty/list/members@xmpp.org/thread/ODT43WOCRUE…
*4. Progress report: decision-ready proposal for XSF's EU-based
presence*Follow-up
on Guus's commitment to present a concrete proposal for establishing a
minimal EU presence for XSF, per action point of the Board meeting on 15
Dec 2025.
*5. Summit follow-up discussion: Second XMPP Summit 2026 (online?)*Summit
discussions showed interest; mailing-list feedback was limited. Validate
whether sufficient interest still exists. Decide whether to proceed with
lightweight exploration (e.g. call for volunteers, rough scope), or
explicitly conclude that no further action will be taken at this time.
*6. Summit follow-up discussion: Structured outreach initiatives*Ideas were
discussed at the Summit; minimal follow-up input was received via the
mailing list. Identify one or two concrete outreach initiatives worth
pursuing (including an owner and success criteria), or explicitly conclude
that no further action will be taken at this time.
*7. Summit follow-up discussion: XMPP 2*Prior discussions expressed
interest; little asynchronous feedback was received. Determine whether
there is sufficient interest to warrant further work, and either mandate a
scoped next step or explicitly conclude that no further action will be
taken at this time.
*8. Any Other Business (AOB)*Items not listed above that require brief
attention.
*9. Date of next meeting*Agreement on the date of the next Board meeting.
*10. Close*
Closing of the meeting.
Please review the relevant materials ahead of the meeting so that we can
use our time efficiently.
Kind regards,
Guus
I've started proxy voting via xmpp:memberbot@xmpp.org on the membership
applications listed here:
https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Membership_Applications_Q1_2026
We will hold a member meeting on March 5th to formally approve the
voting results.
The meeting particulars are:
Date: March 5th, 2026
Time: 19:00 UTC
Location: xmpp:xsf@muc.xmpp.org
When you have problems with memberbot please contact my directly by
email or xmpp.
Thanks,
Alex
I have created the membership application page for Q1 2026 at:
https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Membership_Applications_Q1_2026
The following XSF members have to reapply:
* Benson Muite
* Ludovic Bocquet
* Jan-Carel Brand
* Dave Cridland
* Nicola Fabiano
* Alexander Gnauck
* Daniel Gultsch
* Tim Henkes
* Edward Maurer
* Jérôme Poisson
* Mario Sabatino
* Jonas Schäfer
* Florian Schmaus
* Winfried Tilanus
* Trần H. Trung
* Arne-Bruen Vogelsang
* Matthew Wild
* Heiner Wolf
Regards,
Alex