November 2014 - IOT

Re: [IOT] [Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0347 (Internet of Things - Discovery)
by Cramer, E.R. (Eelco) 24 Nov '14

24 Nov '14

In the IoT mailing list (cc)?! Cheers, Eelco On 24 Nov 2014, at 16:49, Dave Cridland <dave(a)cridland.net<mailto:dave@cridland.net>> wrote: On 24 November 2014 at 15:29, XMPP Extensions Editor <editor(a)xmpp.org<mailto:editor@xmpp.org>> wrote: Version 0.3 of XEP-0347 (Internet of Things - Discovery) has been released. Abstract: This specification describes an architecture based on the XMPP protocol whereby Things can be installed and safely discovered by their owners and connected into networks of Things. Changelog: [See revision history] (pw) Diff: http://xmpp.org/extensions/diff/api/xep/0347/diff/0.2/vs/0.3 URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0347.html I've noticed two updates to this XEP, yet no discussion on the mailing list at all. While that's certainly not a formal requirement, the changes looks like functional ones - where's the discussion for these changes happening? Dave. This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

1 0

Re: [IOT] [Members] Goals for the XSF Board
by Joachim Lindborg 24 Nov '14

24 Nov '14

Adam great that you put XMPP +IoT on the agenda, I will gladly help out there. I have just started http://xmpp-iot.github.io a github site to ease the introduction of "xmpp internet of things" making it possible to fork and help in updating. Also with a "manifest" for backers. *Regards* Joachim Lindborg CTO, systems architect Sustainable Innovation SUST.se Barnhusgatan 3 111 23 Stockholm Email: Joachim.lindborg(a)sust.se linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/joachimlindborg Tel +46 706-442270 2014-11-24 1:10 GMT+01:00 Adam Brault <adam(a)andyet.com>: > > Laura <laura.gill(a)surevine.com>, wrote: > >> What goals would you like to see set for the Board for the year ahead? > > Just thought I’d share my goals for the board in this thread, which I’ll > be raising in the board meeting tomorrow and trying to figure out how to > succinctly add to the Trello board without overloading it :) > > My strong desire is to help the board best serve the interests of the > XSF—and I hope these things are aimed in that direction. > > In that light, I’d love to hear feedback / criticism / reality checks from > XSF members on these. Guaranteed many of you have been thinking about these > things so much longer than I have. > > *Active website * > > - Active and strategically opinionated blog—dismantle myths, responses > to blog posts on other sites, present pros for using XMPP instead of > bespoke protocols or building YAMS (yet another messaging silo) > - Link to and feature howtos and new XMPP projects on the XSF site and > blog. > - "Position paper" style pages on various topics (optimization, > performance, federation, s2s, mobile), with relevant blog posts and howtos > linked > - Publicly summarizing the Council's agenda > - XMPP +IoT, XMPP + WebRTC sections > - Use GitHub to empower the XSF and extended XMPP community to > collaborate on the site — Allow submission of new/revised content and blog > posts via pull request > > *Proactively build the community* > > - There are 2600 repositories on GitHub containing "XMPP"( > https://github.com/search?q=xmpp&type=Repositories) Who are these > people and how many of them are connected to the XSF? > - Invite people to idle in an easily accessible channel (IRC + Web + > XMPP) > - Feature, publicize, and praise new XMPP based projects > - Seek to grow the active XSF membership, particularly those working > in growing areas of tech intersecting with XMPP (IoT, WebRTC, indie tech) > - Encourage and feature meetups and relevant conferences > - Encourage members to attend technical conferences and submit talks > supportive of the XSF's strategic agenda > > *Invite and listen to criticism of XMPP* > > - Listen, and work to address it where the Council agrees we should > - Answer misconceptions with position pages and education > - Help council prioritize work based on this feedback > > I would love to hear feedback and criticism from XSF members on all of the > above. Do you agree? Disagree? Does anything stand out to you as blatantly > ignorant or wrong or naively overambitious? Let me have it! :) > > Thanks so much. > > —Adam >

2 1

IoT discovery (XEP-0347)
by Cramer, E.R. (Eelco) 21 Nov '14

21 Nov '14

I’m working my way through the IoT discovery XEP. For my use case I would like to update the Meta Information in the registry after a device has been claimed. For example: 1. I install a Thing in a room and the Thing registeres itself in the registry. 2. I claim ownership of the Thing. 3. I now want to update the Meta Information with information not known by thing itself like for example location, room number, building number etc. How should I proceed with step 3? A Thing can update its meta-information in the registry but an owner cannot update the meta-information of the Thing or tell a Thing to do so as of the current version of the spec. Any ideas? Thanks, Eelco This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

3 9

IoT conference in Silicon Valley, nov 19-20
by Peter Waher 05 Nov '14

05 Nov '14

Hello everybody Is anybody interested in speaking about XMPP & IoT at this IoT conference? http://gogonetlive.com/ We got a question to participate, but can't attend due to other engagements those days. If you're interested, send me a mail and I'll forward your interest. Best regards, Peter Waher

1 0