17 Dec
2012
17 Dec
'12
8:54 a.m.
Hi all,
I was actually wondering myself about the status of XMPP & SIP usage for sensors. I
dropped Peter a mail a month ago to hear more about the deployment situation.
It seems that if there are implementations then they are using HTTP.
Ciao
Hannes
On Dec 17, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 17 December 2012 12:35, Peter Waher
<Peter.Waher(a)clayster.com> wrote:
Hello,
I’m writing to you to, to ask about the status of the following document:
http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/sensors.html
I’m interested in developing extensions for
allowing sensor data communication and IoT, among other things. We have multiple
applications using XMPP and sensors. Before proposing an extension by ourselves, I’ve been
waiting to find colleagues working in the same area, so we could propose an extension
together, this increasing the probability for it to become useful.
What is the status of the above mentioned document? Is it set in stone, or is it possible
to work on it, redefine parts of it, etc., in order for it to become more general and
suitable also to our needs? Are you able to invite other authors to partake in the
development of this proposed extension?
It was rejected by the council at its meeting 2011-04-27:
http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/council/2011-May/003164.html
Nathan posted his reasoning here:
http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2011-May/024545.html - and
the discussion continued here:
http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2011-May/024547.html
No new version was submitted as far as I know, and I know of no public
implementations of the protocol (that's not to say there aren't any of
course...).
Regards,
Matthew