10 Feb
2015
10 Feb
'15
1 p.m.
Hi,
I've updated the document on https://servicelab.github.io/iot-discovery.html in an
attempt to solve issues that I was still having with this proposal.
On 05 Feb 2015, at 14:19, Cramer, E.R. (Eelco)
<Eelco.Cramer(a)tno.nl> wrote:
What I do not like yet is:
- What is still missing is some way to 'discover' the ontology that is supported
by the registry.
I've updated the'Determining support' paragraph with a method to discover
namespaces.
https://servicelab.github.io/iot-discovery.html#support
- That there is a 'default' namespace for
properties that cannot be set by the sender of the message. I would probably like to have
a way that a 'default' can be provided by the sender. Maybe an attribute
'defaultns' in the parent elements or something like that.
I added a 'defaultns' attribute to the parent element of 'property'
elements that must be used to set a default namespace for the properties.
What do you guys think?
Cheers,
Eelco
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the
addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the
sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail,
for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks
inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.