12 Mar
2013
12 Mar
'13
3:01 a.m.
I have two ideas that I think could be good. Like to try them on the list
before putting them on the wiki
*Implementing EXI both server and clients*:
Quite large work but perhaps to boring for the GSOC.
http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/2012-March/006712.html
http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2013-March/027188.html
*Next generation sensor networks and services*:
Peter W and I is working on a new set of XEP's for creating interoperable
flow of data for the Internet Of Things with the whole chain of deploying
devices and connecting services
The project would implement the proposed XEP's and create services
utilizing open sensor networks for energy services, support elderly,
internet of sports.
earlier work
http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/sensors.html
http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/2013-January/006921.html
/Joachim
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Simon Tennant <simon(a)buddycloud.com>
Date: 2013/3/11
Subject: Re: [Members] Google Summer of Code 2013 - please submit potential
ideas
To: XSF Members <members(a)xmpp.org>
Following up on the call for GSOC interest, I'm inclined to believe
that there are no projects interested in going through the XSF this
year. if indeed you are, please submit today so that we can make a
decision about pushing in an application or not.
http://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Summer_of_Code_2013.
S.
On 6 March 2013 12:01, Simon Tennant <simon(a)buddycloud.com> wrote:
We're at the point of deciding whether there is
interest in GOSC. While
there is definitely student interest, it's more a question of leadership
and
mentoring time.
I put together a template for gathering project ideas with an emphasis on
them demonstrating how they will do two things that I think are very
important if we do decide to go ahead with GSOC:
* be useful to XMPP
* demonstrate that the student is a communicative self-starter.
If you have ideas - please update them on:
http://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Summer_of_Code_2013.
Deadline: March 11.
This will then help us decide if there is enough interest and that the
potential projects are worth sheparding.
S.
--
Simon Tennant | buddycloud.com | +49 17 8545 0880 | office hours:
goo.gl/tQgxP
--
Simon Tennant | buddycloud.com | +49 17 8545 0880 | office hours:
goo.gl/tQgxP
--
Hälsningar
Joachim Lindborg
Teknisk Chef
Sustainable Innovation AB
Adress: Box 55998 102 16 Stockholm
Besöksadress: Storgatan 31 (Malmgården)
Email: Joachim.lindborg(a)sust.se, www.sust.se
Tel +46 706-442270
13 Mar
13 Mar
9:06 a.m.
New subject: Question: SASL EXTERNAL for client auth
Can anyone speak from experience on using SASL EXTERNAL for c2s connections? E.g. A
client authenticating with a certificate rather than a password. Certificates seem more
appropriate for managing many IoT cases.
I can't find much — or any — information on SASL EXTERNAL support for most of the
common servers and client implementations. So has anyone used certificate auth for XMPP
clients? I'm particularly interested in the more common open source clients and
servers – Smack, OpenFire, ejabberd, Prosody but any first-hand knowledge would be
helpful.
Thanks in advance.
-Thom
This email and any information disclosed in connection herewith, whether written or oral,
is the property of EnerNOC, Inc. and is intended only for the person or entity to which it
is addressed.
This email may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected
from disclosure.
Distributing or copying any information contained in this email to anyone other than the
intended recipient is strictly prohibited.
9:14 a.m.
New subject: Question: SASL EXTERNAL for client auth
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Thomas Nichols <tnichols(a)enernoc.com> wrote:
Can anyone speak from experience on using SASL
EXTERNAL for c2s connections? E.g. A client authenticating with a certificate rather than
a password. Certificates seem more appropriate for managing many IoT cases.
I can't find much — or any — information on SASL EXTERNAL support for most of the
common servers and client implementations. So has anyone used certificate auth for XMPP
clients? I'm particularly interested in the more common open source clients and
servers – Smack, OpenFire, ejabberd, Prosody but any first-hand knowledge would be
helpful.
I can't speak for the OSS servers, but Swift (OSS) has been tested
quite a lot with SASL EXTERNAL against M-Link (not OSS).
/K
1:14 p.m.
New subject: Question: SASL EXTERNAL for client auth
I've used sasl external on openfire with a nodejs client recently and blogged about
it: http://servicelab.org/2012/04/26/how-to-use-xmpp-sasl-external-with-node-js/
My experience is that maneging the certicicates is not that easy. Also it doesnt help that
the certificates need to be server signed as well.
Hope this helps.
Br. Eelco
Sent from my mobile phone
On 13 mrt. 2013, at 16:07, "Thomas Nichols"
<tnichols@enernoc.com<mailto:tnichols@enernoc.com>> wrote:
Can anyone speak from experience on using SASL EXTERNAL for c2s connections? E.g. A
client authenticating with a certificate rather than a password. Certificates seem more
appropriate for managing many IoT cases.
I can't find much — or any — information on SASL EXTERNAL support for most of the
common servers and client implementations. So has anyone used certificate auth for XMPP
clients? I'm particularly interested in the more common open source clients and
servers – Smack, OpenFire, ejabberd, Prosody but any first-hand knowledge would be
helpful.
Thanks in advance.
-Thom
This email and any information disclosed in connection herewith, whether written or oral,
is the property of EnerNOC, Inc. and is intended only for the person or entity to which it
is addressed.
This email may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected
from disclosure.
Distributing or copying any information contained in this email to anyone other than the
intended recipient is strictly prohibited.
_______________________________________________
IOT mailing list
IOT@xmpp.org<mailto:IOT@xmpp.org>
http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/iot
This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at
http://www.tno.nl/emaildisclaimer
4208
days inactive
4209
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Cramer, E.R. (Eelco) -
Joachim Lindborg -
Kevin Smith -
Thomas Nichols