12 Nov
2015
12 Nov
'15
9:24 p.m.
I find this slightly unfortunate, because XEP-0053 reads:
The XMPP Registrar shall be responsible for interacting with the
IANA on behalf of the XMPP Standards Foundation. If an XMPP
Extension Protocol specification requires interaction with the IANA,
that fact shall be noted by the document author(s) and discussed on
the Standards mailing list along with normal discussion of the XEP.
The XMPP Registrar shall collaborate with the author(s) to submit an
appropriate request to the IANA.
I suppose it could be argued that this registration has been made on
behalf of ISO/IEC/IEEE working group 21451-1-4 (not the XSF), or even on
behalf of no organization.
What exactly is the relationship between this URI scheme and XEP-0347?
Peter
On 11/12/15 5:09 AM, Peter Waher wrote:
Hello Peter
Yes, this was registered in August:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/uri-schemes.xhtml
https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/iotdisco
http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/iotdisco.pdf
I will also update XEP-0347 (ยง3.9) to reflect this new URI scheme for
encoding conceptual identities of things.
Best regards,
Peter Waher
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 19:55:37 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <peter(a)andyet.net>
To: XMPP in the Internet of Things <iot(a)xmpp.org>
Subject: Re: [IOT] IANA application
Message-ID: <5643FFA9.7030801(a)andyet.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Was this ever done?
Sorry, this message was stuck in the queue.
On 7/10/15 10:41 AM, Peter Waher wrote:
> Hello
>
> During the work in other standards groups, there has been some interest
> in the discovery model presented in XEP-0347. This has lead to the
> desire to update the IoT-discovery encoding described in the XEP
> somewhat and formalize it into a URI scheme. I?ve therefore prepared an
> application to IANA for a provisional URI scheme. The idea is to
send it
> by the end of next week. So, if you have
time, and an interest, you?re
> welcome to return any comments, suggestions or questions to me by then,
> so I have a chance to update the application before mailing it. The
idea
> is to update XEP-0347 after the approval of
such a provisional URI
scheme.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Peter Waher